<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aphorisms about life’s uncertainties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dismountingourtiger.com/uncategorized/aphorisms-about-life%e2%80%99s-uncertainties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dismountingourtiger.com/uncategorized/aphorisms-about-life%e2%80%99s-uncertainties/</link>
	<description>He who rides a tiger is afraid to dismount</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:32:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac K.</title>
		<link>http://www.dismountingourtiger.com/uncategorized/aphorisms-about-life%e2%80%99s-uncertainties/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dismountingourtiger.com/?p=177#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Interesting - found you on econlog.
Point of interested: in considering God as transcendent (above time as well), creation at the point of the Big-Bang IS equivalent to recreation/guiding at all points after: since he sees to the end from the beginning, he essentially &quot;chose&quot; the end and all intermediate steps.

Kind of like knowing and seeing where to hit a break on a pool table to get all the balls in on the first shot.

Also; Maimonides discusses the concept of a miracle as a natural occurance rare only for it&#039;s placement, extent, and timing. The astrological possiblity (infinitesmally small) of the Splitting of the Sea actually occurring isn&#039;t a contradiction of God, it&#039;s a validation of it being setup from the start to work out correctly when needed.

Isaac: Thanks for the comments. We probably see uncertainty in different ways. I see it as intrinsic to being non-trivial and real; which means that there is no way to know the future with certainty, even for a being (or creator) with an infinite capacity to know. Of course, I&#039;m not certain of that and have no wish to convert anyone else to my viewpoint. I am happy with these thoughts at this stage of my life, and run them up the flagpole from time to time to stimulate discussion. (By the way: had four years of Catholic theology in high school and studied Thomas Aquinas&#039;s &quot;Summa Theologica&quot; on my own while studying engineering in college. For more than 20 years of my early adulthood I was comforted by my belief that a transcendent, infinite God knew everything; that God was the ultimate engineer. Now I suspect that things are actually far more awesome than that.) 

Hope you&#039;ll visit again. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting &#8211; found you on econlog.<br />
Point of interested: in considering God as transcendent (above time as well), creation at the point of the Big-Bang IS equivalent to recreation/guiding at all points after: since he sees to the end from the beginning, he essentially &#8220;chose&#8221; the end and all intermediate steps.</p>
<p>Kind of like knowing and seeing where to hit a break on a pool table to get all the balls in on the first shot.</p>
<p>Also; Maimonides discusses the concept of a miracle as a natural occurance rare only for it&#8217;s placement, extent, and timing. The astrological possiblity (infinitesmally small) of the Splitting of the Sea actually occurring isn&#8217;t a contradiction of God, it&#8217;s a validation of it being setup from the start to work out correctly when needed.</p>
<p>Isaac: Thanks for the comments. We probably see uncertainty in different ways. I see it as intrinsic to being non-trivial and real; which means that there is no way to know the future with certainty, even for a being (or creator) with an infinite capacity to know. Of course, I&#8217;m not certain of that and have no wish to convert anyone else to my viewpoint. I am happy with these thoughts at this stage of my life, and run them up the flagpole from time to time to stimulate discussion. (By the way: had four years of Catholic theology in high school and studied Thomas Aquinas&#8217;s &#8220;Summa Theologica&#8221; on my own while studying engineering in college. For more than 20 years of my early adulthood I was comforted by my belief that a transcendent, infinite God knew everything; that God was the ultimate engineer. Now I suspect that things are actually far more awesome than that.) </p>
<p>Hope you&#8217;ll visit again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
